<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Draft Presentation for Nairobi Council Meeting
- To: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Draft Presentation for Nairobi Council Meeting
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:42:25 +0100
I would keep the presentation short for the Council meeting, as Olga suggests,
but also ensure that it includes concrete information on when the model can be
delivered. That is a key point for Council members.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 2 mars 2010 à 03:39, Olga Cavalli a écrit :
> Thanks Ken.
> Perhaps we can prepare shorter version for GNSO and a more detailed one for
> wrap up and special WPM meeting.
> What about including the list of projects we have agreed today and the
> results of the excercise we did among the group as examples of the ongoing
> work? That would go in the longer version...
> Looking forward to talking to you tomorrow.
> Regards
> Olga
>
> 2010/3/1 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Thanks Ken. Nice job.
>
> Is this for possible use in the Council meeting on 10 March? If so, note
> that there are only 20 minutes allocated for this agenda item and that
> includes Council & Community discussion. We can discuss this in our call
> tomorrow, but in my preliminary opinion we would only have time for the
> following slides in this meeting: 1-5 and 9-11.
>
> The topic is on the agenda for the Wrap-Up meeting on the 11th and there may
> be a little more time in that meeting if Councilors would like to get more
> info.
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> From: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Ken Bour
> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 4:34 PM
> To: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Draft Presentation for Nairobi Council Meeting
>
> WPM Team Members:
>
>
> At the team’s request, I have prepared the attached PowerPoint slide deck for
> your review.
>
>
> My overall objectives were:
>
> 1) Review/remind Councilors why this WPM was undertaken, i.e. its
> mission/purpose
>
> · Referencing the Staff GNSO Participation and Attendance study and
> its conclusions
>
> 2) Show the critical thinking and planning that went into the team’s
> initial work plan structure – all of November
>
> · The team had to invent its own model conceptualizations and
> rationale
>
> · Iterative six step internal validation process
>
> 3) Explain how the time has been utilized
>
> · Graphed the 6 step process since December to show the team’s
> progress
>
> · Most steps have taken < a month and the trajectory has been
> steadily upward/forward
>
> · As with any complex iterative process, it became necessary, through
> testing/learning, to revisit earlier decisions
>
> · Team mindful of saving the entire Council those machinations
>
> 4) Highlight team decisions made
>
> 5) Outline remaining action items and decisions yet to be completed (I
> guessed at March-April)
>
> 6) Q&A
>
>
> I presume that tomorrow’s call will largely be taken up with going through
> this slide deck to make sure that these are the points we want to make.
>
>
> Once we finalize the content, I will also make a PDF so that it can be
> uploaded to Adobe Connect in Nairobi.
>
>
> Olga – I haven’t included any speaker notes yet, but I am willing to write
> some after our call tomorrow. I wanted first to see if the team generally
> approves of the approach taken and content.
>
>
> Ken
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|