Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Draft Presentation for Nairobi Council Meeting

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

I would keep the presentation short for the Council meeting, as Olga suggests, 
but also ensure that it includes concrete information on when the model can be 
delivered. That is a key point for Council members.

Thanks,

Stéphane

Le 2 mars 2010 à 03:39, Olga Cavalli a écrit :

> Thanks Ken.
> Perhaps we can prepare  shorter version for GNSO and a more detailed one for 
> wrap up and special WPM meeting.
> What about including the list of projects  we have agreed today and the 
> results of the excercise we did among the group as examples of the ongoing 
> work? That would go in the longer version...
> Looking forward to talking to you tomorrow.
> Regards
> Olga
> 
> 2010/3/1 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Thanks Ken.  Nice job. 
>  
> Is this for possible use in the Council meeting on 10 March?  If so, note 
> that there are only 20 minutes allocated for this agenda item and that 
> includes Council & Community discussion.  We can discuss this in our call 
> tomorrow, but in my preliminary opinion we would only have time for the 
> following slides in this meeting: 1-5 and 9-11. 
>  
> The topic is on the agenda for the Wrap-Up meeting on the 11th and there may 
> be a little more time in that meeting if Councilors would like to get more 
> info.
>  
> Chuck
>  
>  
> 
> From: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Ken Bour
> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 4:34 PM
> To: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Draft Presentation for Nairobi Council Meeting
> 
> WPM Team Members:
> 
>  
> At the team’s request, I have prepared the attached PowerPoint slide deck for 
> your review.  
> 
>  
> My overall objectives were:
> 
> 1)      Review/remind Councilors why this WPM was undertaken, i.e. its 
> mission/purpose
> 
> ·         Referencing the Staff GNSO Participation and Attendance study and 
> its conclusions
> 
> 2)      Show the critical thinking and planning that went into the team’s 
> initial work plan structure – all of November
> 
> ·         The team had to invent its own model conceptualizations and 
> rationale
> 
> ·         Iterative six step internal validation process
> 
> 3)      Explain how the time has been utilized
> 
> ·         Graphed the 6 step process since December to show the team’s 
> progress
> 
> ·         Most steps have taken < a month and the trajectory has been 
> steadily upward/forward
> 
> ·         As with any complex iterative process, it became necessary, through 
> testing/learning, to revisit earlier decisions
> 
> ·         Team mindful of saving the entire Council those machinations
> 
> 4)      Highlight team decisions made
> 
> 5)      Outline remaining action items and decisions yet to be completed (I 
> guessed at March-April)
> 
> 6)      Q&A
> 
>  
> I presume that tomorrow’s call will largely be taken up with going through 
> this slide deck to make sure that these are the points we want to make.  
> 
>  
> Once we finalize the content, I will also make a PDF so that it can be 
> uploaded to Adobe Connect in Nairobi. 
> 
>  
> Olga – I haven’t included any speaker notes yet, but I am willing to write 
> some after our call tomorrow.   I wanted first to see if the team generally 
> approves of the approach taken and content.
> 
>  
> Ken
> 
>  
>