RE: [gtld-council] PDP Dec 05: Follow-up to 23 June

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I also think we need to further discuss the phrase that mentioned "to
which it was targeted".

Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> philip.sheppard@xxxxxx
> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 12:02 PM
> To: Liz Williams
> Cc: gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gtld-council] PDP Dec 05: Follow-up to 23 June
> 
> How about this for clarity:
> 
> "An application will be rejected if it is determined that 
> there is opposition to it from among established institutions 
> of the economic sector, or cultural community, and the degree 
> of that opposition is substantial.
> 
> Note
> Clarifies our intent
> Deletes redundant "language community" as it is subset of cultural
> 
> Philip
>