Re: [soac-mapo] Please participate - Poll on updated recommendations

[Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>]

Hi Evan,

What do you see as the essential differences between what we're proposing 
regarding the expert panel and what's in the AGB now?

Richard


On Sep 16, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:

> 
> 
> On 16 September 2010 12:43, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>  
> There shortly will be another Doodle Poll to determine levels of support for 
> various issues that we have been discussing related to these.
> 
> 
> 
> BTW, I notice that the poll didn't ask for comment on my suggestion that 
> Issue 6 be eliminated. If there is agreeement on 4.4e that "The number of 
> experts to be consulted, the method of their selection and terms of their 
> engagement, are to be determined by the Board subject to these policies", 
> then the entire point behind issue 6 -- the relative merits of specific 
> experts -- becomes out of scope.
> 
> Perhaps Issue 6 could be replaced by a something along the lines of:
> 
> "The evolution of the AGB's Rec6 DRSP to the CWG's proposal of an expert 
> panel indicates that existing choices will need to be reconsidered in light 
> of the substantial changes in requirements and expectations."
> 
> - Evan
> 
> 
>