RE: [soac-mapo] Please participate - Poll on updated recommendations

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

We will hopefully get to Issue in our meeting today.

 

Chuck

 

From: evanleibovitch@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:evanleibovitch@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Evan Leibovitch
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 1:39 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Robin Gross; soac-mapo
Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Please participate - Poll on updated recommendations

 

 

On 16 September 2010 12:43, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


 

        There shortly will be another Doodle Poll to determine levels of 
support for various issues that we have been discussing related to these.



BTW, I notice that the poll didn't ask for comment on my suggestion that Issue 
6 be eliminated. If there is agreeement on 4.4e that "The number of experts to 
be consulted, the method of their selection and terms of their engagement, are 
to be determined by the Board subject to these policies", then the entire point 
behind issue 6 -- the relative merits of specific experts -- becomes out of 
scope.

Perhaps Issue 6 could be replaced by a something along the lines of:

"The evolution of the AGB's Rec6 DRSP to the CWG's proposal of an expert panel 
indicates that existing choices will need to be reconsidered in light of the 
substantial changes in requirements and expectations."

- Evan