Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] GAC Communique on JAS

[Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 12/15/10 4:02 PM, Avri Doria wrote:

...
> > Therefore there is an "errata fix" to recommend to DAGv5 which is addressed in 
> > part by the comments of Amadeu (copied), Avri (wg contributor) and others.
> Note that submitted that as an individual and not as a member of this group.  
> The fact that I am a member of this group is coincidental and not causal.

Of course. The JAS point being that some requirement ostensibly 
unrelated to JAS issues may, as an unintended consequence, limit 
"qualified" more strongly than "need", and in the limit, make 
"qualified" applicants infeasible to meaningfully materially aid in 
any form.
Eric