Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Fwd: Communique: Open Letter from DCA to US Department of Commerce

["Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Eric,

I stay with my wording. It's intent is to avoid
further delays, simply that.

Avoiding further delays means the intended
beneficiaries of the achievements of this WG,
will be among those who will be able to present
an application. No application window, no
new applicants can apply, no assistance to
disenfranchised parties is then needed...

Tony

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Eric Brunner-Williams" <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Richard Tindal" <richardtindal@xxxxxx>; "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>; 
"soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Fwd: Communique: Open Letter from DCA to 
US Department of Commerce

> On 1/21/11 9:36 AM, Anthony Harris wrote:
> > I agree entirely with Richard on this, and am
> > supportive of any action taken which advocates
> > moving the new gTLD process to aperture.
> Tony,
>
> Any action???
>
> That's pretty broad.
>
> How about "actions which do not further privilege 'a group of participants 
> that engage in ICANN's processes to a greater extent than Internet users 
> generally'"?
> Eric