Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Fwd: Communique: Open Letter from DCA to US Department of Commerce

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

+1


On 21 Jan 2011, at 10:50, Anthony Harris wrote:

> 
> Eric,
> 
> I stay with my wording. It's intent is to avoid
> further delays, simply that.
> 
> Avoiding further delays means the intended
> beneficiaries of the achievements of this WG,
> will be among those who will be able to present
> an application. No application window, no
> new applicants can apply, no assistance to
> disenfranchised parties is then needed...
> 
> Tony
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Brunner-Williams" 
> <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Richard Tindal" <richardtindal@xxxxxx>; "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>; 
> "soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 12:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Fwd: Communique: Open Letter from DCA to 
> US Department of Commerce
> 
> 
>> On 1/21/11 9:36 AM, Anthony Harris wrote:
>>> 
>>> I agree entirely with Richard on this, and am
>>> supportive of any action taken which advocates
>>> moving the new gTLD process to aperture.
>> 
>> Tony,
>> 
>> Any action???
>> 
>> That's pretty broad.
>> 
>> How about "actions which do not further privilege 'a group of participants 
>> that engage in ICANN's processes to a greater extent than Internet users 
>> generally'"?
>> 
>> Eric 
> 
>