ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] The GAC weighs in on MR2

  • To: Evan Leibovitch <evan@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] The GAC weighs in on MR2
  • From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 05:30:41 +0900

Hi,

Thanks for the questions, I think that Karla may compile them and we can add
discussing about them as item for tomorrow call agenda, if you agree.

@WGMembers I saw we had thread about the questions regarding the cost, in
addition to that Evan raised questions about legal points related to
foundation etc, please ask concrete questions about the different issues and
with rationale behind so Karla can pass them to staff and we can ask them
for specific support.

Best,

Rafik



2011/5/30 Evan Leibovitch <evan@xxxxxxxxx>

> Hi Rafik,
>
> I agree that we should give Karla a more detailed request. Obviously
> generic questions will be met with generic responses.
>
> I would like to start a brief discussion on what we will need from ICANN
> staff in order to move ahead. Personally, I think that amongst the specific
> details that we need is a detailed breakdown of the $185K. Such a detail
> breakdown must indicate how much of the $185K is allocated to:
>
> - cover the actual (ie, real time) cost to process the application
> - apply various tests and controls (ie contention) that may not be
> appropriate to JAS-qualified applications
> - repay costs of historic policy work
> - replenish the reserve fund for costs incurred by previous applications
> (ie, .XXX)
> - mitigate risk of lawsuits
> - fund any other relevant cost category (i'm quite sure I don't have them
> all here)
>
> I would also like to obtain a fairly comprehensive set of the assumptions
> and formulas that have been made in order to deduce the current scheme.
>
> I'm sure (and I hope) that others can contribute to build a specific
> request, one that (if answered truthfully and completely) will result in
> information that can better guide our ability to derive a suitable and
>  justifiable amount for a reduced price.
>
> - Evan
>
>
> On 29 May 2011 13:19, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    - We now have further justification for the additional resources
>>>    requested in the last JAS phone call
>>>
>>>
>> regarding the additional resources requested, it will be helpful to draft
>> the questions that JAS WG is asking and the exact nature/expertise that we
>> are looking for, especially about the legal knowledge, few questions and
>> requests which Karla can pass to legal staff and letting them ready in prior
>> to confcall.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Evan Leibovitch, Toronto Canada
> Em: evan at telly dot org
> Sk: evanleibovitch
> Tw: el56
>
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy