<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Discussion of Financial criteria and how to set them
- To: tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Discussion of Financial criteria and how to set them
- From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:40:23 +0200
On 26/07/2011 10:58, tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx wrote :
> I totally agree with you that objective criteria are not sufficient,
> and that a case by case inquiry should be undertaken to verify the
> real need of the applicant and prevent gaming. But the absence of
> objective criteria will lead to the totally subjective judgment with
> all kind of complaisance. I think we must avoid both gaming and
> complaisance, and this is possible if we combine objective criteria
> and specific inquiry for each applicant.
I expressed my thoughts on that on the Friday conference call. In case
this was misunderstood, I am *not against* objective criteria. I am
against *only* using objective criteria.
A mix of objective criteria and "deeper diving" with evaluation on a
case by case basis is IMHO the correct way to go. Perhaps the objective
criteria scoring would already eliminate a first layer of applications -
those not scoring very low on the criteria.
Kind regards,
Olivier
--
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|