<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Discussion of Financial criteria and how to set them
- To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Discussion of Financial criteria and how to set them
- From: Dev Anand Teelucksingh <admin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:57:03 -0400
Agreed
Dev Anand Teelucksingh
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>
> On 26/07/2011 10:58, tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx wrote :
>
> I totally agree with you that objective criteria are not sufficient, and
> that a case by case inquiry should be undertaken to verify the real need of
> the applicant and prevent gaming. But the absence of objective criteria will
> lead to the totally subjective judgment with all kind of complaisance. I
> think we must avoid both gaming and complaisance, and this is possible if we
> combine objective criteria and specific inquiry for each applicant.
>
>
> I expressed my thoughts on that on the Friday conference call. In case this
> was misunderstood, I am *not against* objective criteria. I am against
> *only* using objective criteria.
> A mix of objective criteria and "deeper diving" with evaluation on a case
> by case basis is IMHO the correct way to go. Perhaps the objective criteria
> scoring would already eliminate a first layer of applications - those not
> scoring very low on the criteria.
> Kind regards,
>
> Olivier
>
> --
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhDhttp://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|