RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Discussion of Financial criteria and how to set them

[carlos dionisio aguirre <carlosaguirre62@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

+ 1.-

Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
NCA GNSO Council - ICANN
former ALAC member by LACRALO
Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios
Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -
*54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
http://ar.ageiadensi.org 


Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:57:03 -0400
Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Discussion of Financial criteria and how to 
set them
From: admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: ocl@xxxxxxx
CC: tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx; alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx; 
soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx

Agreed 
Dev Anand Teelucksingh

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx> wrote:


  
    
  
  
    

    

    On 26/07/2011 10:58, tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx wrote :
    I totally agree with you that objective criteria
        are not sufficient, and that a case by case inquiry should be
        undertaken to verify the real need of the applicant and prevent
        gaming. But the absence of objective criteria will lead to the
        totally subjective judgment with all kind of complaisance. I
        think we must avoid both gaming and complaisance, and this is
        possible if we combine objective criteria and specific inquiry
        for each applicant. 
    

    I expressed my thoughts on that on the Friday conference call. In
    case this was misunderstood, I am *not against* objective criteria.
    I am against *only* using objective criteria.

    A mix of objective criteria and "deeper diving" with evaluation on a
    case by case basis is IMHO the correct way to go. Perhaps the
    objective criteria scoring would already eliminate a first layer of
    applications - those not scoring very low on the criteria.

    Kind regards,

    

    Olivier

    -- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html