Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Discussion of Financial criteria and how to set them

[Evan Leibovitch <evan@xxxxxxxxx>]

+1
Evan Leibovitch, Toronto Canada
Em: evan at telly dot org
Sk: evanleibovitch
Tw: el56



On 26 July 2011 09:00, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +1.
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 26/07/2011 10:58, tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx wrote :
>>
>> I totally agree with you that objective criteria are not sufficient, and
>> that a case by case inquiry should be undertaken to verify the real need of
>> the applicant and prevent gaming. But the absence of objective criteria will
>> lead to the totally subjective judgment with all kind of complaisance. I
>> think we must avoid both gaming and complaisance, and this is possible if we
>> combine objective criteria and specific inquiry for each applicant.
>>
>>
>> I expressed my thoughts on that on the Friday conference call. In case
>> this was misunderstood, I am *not against* objective criteria. I am against
>> *only* using objective criteria.
>> A mix of objective criteria and "deeper diving" with evaluation on a case
>> by case basis is IMHO the correct way to go. Perhaps the objective criteria
>> scoring would already eliminate a first layer of applications - those not
>> scoring very low on the criteria.
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Olivier
>>
>> --
>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhDhttp://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>>
>>
>