Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Consistency - and Clarification - of Terminology for Final Report

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

+1  on Krista's answers.  Thanks for making it easy.

On the name of the Fund and Foundation, I suggest that giving it a name is part 
of what the group the Board sets up to create it take that task.  In the 
meantime we may want to give it a working name.  How about 'The ICANN Fund' as 
a working name.

a.



On 2 Aug 2011, at 17:25, Krista Papac wrote:

> Carlton and all,
> I’ve commented inline below.
>  
> Krista Papac
> Chief Strategy Officer
> AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd
> Email: krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Web: www.ausregistry.com
>  
> From: owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carlton Samuels
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 11:12 AM
> To: SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx; Ntfy-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Glen de Saint Géry; Karla Valente; Gisella Gruber-White
> Subject: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Consistency - and Clarification - of 
> Terminology for Final Report
>  
> Dear All:
> The preparation for the Final Report is in gear and so we create a product 
> that easily communicate the objectives of this initiative,  Staff is 
> monitoring terms in the Report for consistency in usage.
> 
> The following questions are for your advice and consent:
> 
> -  Name of the program being proposed. Is it Support Development Program 
> Evaluation Process?
> 
> K.Papac>> I agree with Evan, a shorter program name is better. However, I 
> suggest Applicant Support Program for the name of the program itself, and 
> Support Evaluation Process for the process of evaluating those requesting 
> support.
> 
> -  Name of the foundation that is to hold the $2M or other donation
> 
> K.Papac>> I really have no idea….
> 
> -  Name for the applicant asking for support. Do we still want to call it 
> applicant? Is this confusing with the New gTLD Program? We could consider 
> alternatives, such as, New gTLD program Support Candidates or something to 
> that effect.
> 
> K.Papac>> I find it confusing to call applicants asking for support applicant 
> because applicant is what all companies applying to the new gTLD Program are 
> called. I agree with the terms suggested by Evan –  “Support-Requested 
> Applicant" for those in the queue and "Support-Qualified Applicant". These 
> follow a similar naming convention as the Program and Process which adds 
> consistency and hopefully clarity.
> 
> -  In-kind services – have we agreed on this term for any non-financial 
> support offered?
> 
> K.Papac>> I understand the issue others on the WG have with this term and 
> support the term Non-Financial Support.
> 
> -  Developing economies – we still use, countries, nations, etc….
> 
> K.Papac>> I agree with Developing Economies
> 
> -  Support Eligibility criteria – how about this instead of 'qualification 
> criteria'?
> 
> K.Papac>> I agree with Support Eligibility Criteria
> 
> - Support and relief – will we use these terms in combination? Should add to 
> glossary.
> 
> K.Papac>> I prefer to use Support only. To me (and Webster.com) the word 
> ‘support’ refers to help and/or assistance, whereas relief is the removal or 
> lightening of something oppressive, painful, or distressing. Essentially, I 
> prefer the more positive term of ‘support’.
> 
> -  Support Application Review Panel (SARP) – is this final?
> 
> K.Papac>> I agree with Support Application Review Panel
> 
>  
> 
> We will have a 5-minute period allotted on the call tomorrow for your final 
> advice and consent.
> 
>  
> 
> Best,
> 
> Carlton Samuels & Rafik Danmark
> 
>  
> 
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
> =============================