Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Consistency - and Clarification - of Terminology for Final Report

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>]

++1  to Krista's answers and Avri's  concurring to them  :-)

Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)



On 3 August 2011 07:38, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> +1  on Krista's answers.  Thanks for making it easy.
>
> On the name of the Fund and Foundation, I suggest that giving it a name is
> part of what the group the Board sets up to create it take that task.  In
> the meantime we may want to give it a working name.  How about 'The ICANN
> Fund' as a working name.
>
> a.
>
>
>
> On 2 Aug 2011, at 17:25, Krista Papac wrote:
>
> > Carlton and all,
> > I’ve commented inline below.
> >
> > Krista Papac
> > Chief Strategy Officer
> > AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd
> > Email: krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Web: www.ausregistry.com
> >
> > From: owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carlton Samuels
> > Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 11:12 AM
> > To: SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx; Ntfy-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Glen de Saint Géry; Karla Valente; Gisella Gruber-White
> > Subject: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Consistency - and Clarification - of
> Terminology for Final Report
> >
> > Dear All:
> > The preparation for the Final Report is in gear and so we create a
> product that easily communicate the objectives of this initiative,  Staff is
> monitoring terms in the Report for consistency in usage.
> >
> > The following questions are for your advice and consent:
> >
> > -  Name of the program being proposed. Is it Support Development Program
> Evaluation Process?
> >
> > K.Papac>> I agree with Evan, a shorter program name is better. However, I
> suggest Applicant Support Program for the name of the program itself, and
> Support Evaluation Process for the process of evaluating those requesting
> support.
> >
> > -  Name of the foundation that is to hold the $2M or other donation
> >
> > K.Papac>> I really have no idea….
> >
> > -  Name for the applicant asking for support. Do we still want to call it
> applicant? Is this confusing with the New gTLD Program? We could consider
> alternatives, such as, New gTLD program Support Candidates or something to
> that effect.
> >
> > K.Papac>> I find it confusing to call applicants asking for support
> applicant because applicant is what all companies applying to the new gTLD
> Program are called. I agree with the terms suggested by Evan –
>  “Support-Requested Applicant" for those in the queue and "Support-Qualified
> Applicant". These follow a similar naming convention as the Program and
> Process which adds consistency and hopefully clarity.
> >
> > -  In-kind services – have we agreed on this term for any non-financial
> support offered?
> >
> > K.Papac>> I understand the issue others on the WG have with this term and
> support the term Non-Financial Support.
> >
> > -  Developing economies – we still use, countries, nations, etc….
> >
> > K.Papac>> I agree with Developing Economies
> >
> > -  Support Eligibility criteria – how about this instead of
> 'qualification criteria'?
> >
> > K.Papac>> I agree with Support Eligibility Criteria
> >
> > - Support and relief – will we use these terms in combination? Should add
> to glossary.
> >
> > K.Papac>> I prefer to use Support only. To me (and Webster.com) the word
> ‘support’ refers to help and/or assistance, whereas relief is the removal or
> lightening of something oppressive, painful, or distressing. Essentially, I
> prefer the more positive term of ‘support’.
> >
> > -  Support Application Review Panel (SARP) – is this final?
> >
> > K.Papac>> I agree with Support Application Review Panel
> >
> >
> >
> > We will have a 5-minute period allotted on the call tomorrow for your
> final advice and consent.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Carlton Samuels & Rafik Danmark
> >
> >
> >
> > ==============================
> > Carlton A Samuels
> > Mobile: 876-818-1799
> > Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
> > =============================
>
>
>