Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] financial support implementation plans posted for comment

[Alex Gakuru <gakuru@xxxxxxxxx>]

See also: Recommendation 30 - Implementation, Impact and Feasibility (M)

The PDP-WT recommends that PDP WGs be required to provide input on issues
related to implementation on all policy recommendations. This input could
include a discussion of the impacts of the policy, both positive and
negative, including but not limited to economic, competition, operations,
privacy and other rights, scalability and feasibility. When
appropriate the following should be considered:

o Recommend the inclusion of implementation guidelines as part of the Final
Report;
o Consultation with the WG / Council on the draft implementation plan;
o The creation of an implementation team that consists of representatives
of the WG, amongst others, which would be tasked to review / provide input
during the implementation phase

All reports should include a statement on the WG discussion concerning
impact of the proposed recommendations, which could consider areas as noted
above. Further guidance on this issue is to be included in the PDP Manual."
- - -

thanks,

Alex


On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Alex Gakuru <gakuru@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Dear Carla,
>
> Thank you very much for clarifying on this. Going forward it is necessary
> to align JAS policy "monitoring outcomes and correcting policies" along
> Policy Development Process Work Team Updated Final Report & Recommendations
> 28 September, 2011 (pp. 138 -139) adopted by the Board at
> http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-08dec11-en.htm#2.5
>
> - - - snip- - -
> Comment (by AG)
>
> "The concept of monitoring outcomes needs to have an accompanying method
> to make corrections to a policy if a policy is not working as originally
> intended, without having to go through the full PDP process. Once the new
> PDP is implemented, the GNSO Council should charter a small group to
> propose such a change. This should not wait until a full review of the PDP
> process takes place."
>
> WG Response
>
> "In relation to monitoring outcomes and correcting policies, the WT notes
> that a process does exist to make changes before a policy is adopted by the
> Board. The WT,however, acknowledges that no such mechanism exists after
> adoption by the Board and in the proposed PDP the only way to make changes
> would be a new PDP. The WT did point out that if such a change would be
> universally supported, presumably a PDP would require minimal time. The WT
> also noted that a WG Charter could foresee for the WG to review the results
> of the implementation of the policy and propose changes, if deemed
> appropriate. However, it would probably need to be determined on a case by
> case basis whether a new PDP would need to be conducted in order make
> changes to an already adopted and implemented policy."
> - - - snap - - -
>
> regards,
>
> Alex
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Karla Valente 
> <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>>
>> Dear Avri,
>>
>> My apologies for the misunderstanding. I thought the Monday meeting held
>> last week was for the discussion of the plans with the JAS sub-group. I
>> realize now this was the At-Large new gTLD WG, which has JAS WG members.
>>
>> I look forward to hearing from Carlton and Rafik if they wish to have a
>> JAS WG meeting to discuss the current proposal that is out for comments.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Karla Valente
>> Director, gTLD Registry Programs
>> Mobile:  +1 310 936 4639
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri@xxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 11:20 AM
>> To: Karla Valente
>> Cc: JAS; At-Large GTLD WG List
>> Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] financial support implementation
>> plans posted for comment
>> Importance: High
>>
>> Dear Karla,
>>
>> It is not me that is having meetings with the sub-group, but rather, a
>> sub-group of JAS WG members of which I am one that had one meeting with the
>> sub-group, where the proposal was explained to us and we had an opportunity
>> to ask clarifying questions.  We are looking forward to having the
>> opportunity to actually work with the sub-group and Staff on implementation
>> details, an opportunity that was recommended in the JAS WG recommendations
>> but which has not yet occurred and which was NOT included in actually
>> developing the implementation plan.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>>
>> On 21 Dec 2011, at 13:22, Karla Valente wrote:
>>
>> > Dear JAS WG,
>> >
>> > Please note we posted last night for public comment the implementation
>> plans for the applicant support program financial assistance.
>> > Here is the link to announcement:
>> http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-20dec11-en.htm
>> > Please note deadline for comments is 10 January 2012.
>> >
>> > Carlton, Rafik: I know Avri is already having meetings with the
>> sub-group, but please let me know if you want to have a special meeting
>> with the JAS WG to address the public comment.
>> >
>> >
>> > Kind regards,
>> >
>> > Karla Valente
>> > Director, gTLD Registry Programs
>> > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>> > Direct:  + 1 310 301 3878
>> > Mobile:  +1 310 936 4639
>> > Skype: kdlvalente
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>