You, sir Rosenthal, are clearly an expert at fallacious
dialectic.No doubt, you ARE a lawyer.
Continue the condescending, evasive filibuster.
Your
years as an attorney or a judge no doubt have trained you well.
Sorry for any inherent
insult. I just can't let you continue without agreeing with bartender, that you are
obscuring your TRUE motives.
You see, my gut tells me that you are not so interested
in the Public Good, as you state. Nor have you adequately proven that your position
supports the Public Good. Nor have you adequately proven that our position is a challenge
to the Public Good. Nor have you answered questions put before you.
Sorry, but
there it is.