Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
jweb |
Date/Time: |
Fri, October 20, 2000 at 12:25 AM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 95 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Problem to be solved |
Message: |
|
The basic problem of people
with identical names has not been circumvented. Simply adding numbers to a first
name i.e. Bob2.Smith.pid destroys the consistent structure that the rest of the domain
seeks to apply. The logical conclusion are addresses of the form Bob3264.Smith.pid.
The format of the first name is inconsistent and easy to mistake. Also, I doubt whether
such an address would be particulary desirable. To address the consistency
issue, perhaps some form of unique identifier should be built into each address e.g.
each address has a level containing a 4 digit code. The communicative features
of the application are interesting and innovative but can be applied adequately using
contemporary e-mail addresses / structures.
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .pid Application by DADA Spa Moderator, October 7 @ 10:08 PM (13/22)
- Good idea willy, November 5 @ 11:18 PM (0/0)
- Questionable financial capabilities griffiths, November 5 @ 4:53 PM (0/0)
- an interesting idea ocraml, November 5 @ 1:40 AM (0/0)
- Many people with the same name hunter, November 4 @ 1:13 PM (1/1)
- Never heard/seen a more stupid idea Lou, November 2 @ 10:36 PM (2/2)
- innovation idea dargento, November 1 @ 1:38 PM (0/0)
- let's get free corbetta, October 26 @ 8:31 AM (0/0)
- too many ........ Perito Gaudi, October 25 @ 1:27 PM (0/0)
- Problem to be solved jweb, October 20 @ 12:25 AM (1/2)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 6:32 PM (0/0)
- a PID for both physical and digital space Marco Brizzi, October 18 @ 2:59 PM (0/0)
- .pid, a real World-on-Web application TheWizard, October 17 @ 11:41 AM (0/0)
- More Info silvia, October 14 @ 8:38 AM (4/4)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy