Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
timoldham |
Date/Time: |
Wed, November 1, 2000 at 11:45 AM GMT |
Browser: |
Netscape Communicator V4.75 using Windows 95 |
Score: |
5 |
Subject: |
Directory vendor as .dir authority? |
Message: |
|
Although Novell has a stated policy of using open standards to enforce interoperability
in the .dir TLD, and Novell has had a (recently) good record on standards definition
and implementation, I cannot help but ask whether it is in the best interests of
the Internet community to have a for-profit directory products vendor as the authority
over .dir. Of course, it can be claimed that expansion of the entire directory-enablement
space is in Novell's interests, I would draw analogies: I would not want Cisco as
the authority for registered numbers, and I would not want WalMart as the authority
for .shop. Some of the statements made by Novell when asked how they serve the
Internet community are a little questionable. I do not quite believe that they see
themselves as existing to serve the community, as they want us to think. Compaq's
statement supporting Novell is helpful in that it provides some independent support
for their application; Compaq have obviously been historically aligned with Microsoft
and therefore Active Directory, so their support for Novell clearly shows that they
believe Novell will act in good faith. For me, however, I would seek some kind of
independent mechanism to ensure that Novell's authority is subject to some constraint
and cannot be wielded for Novell's pure commercial benefit.
|
| |
Message Thread:
- .dir Application by Novell, Inc. Moderator, October 7 @ 10:27 PM (11/15)
- Support .DIR dakearns, November 1 @ 8:38 PM (0/0)
- Directory vendor as .dir authority? timoldham, November 1 @ 11:45 AM (2/2)
- Digital Identity Tantric, October 26 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)
- Single TLD extension proposals peniel, October 25 @ 11:16 PM (1/1)
- Compaq support for .DIR garyfcampbell, October 25 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)
- Support for .DIR cstone, October 24 @ 5:40 PM (0/0)
- Privacy and security and other questions karl.auerbach, October 23 @ 9:32 PM (1/1)
- To much gloss, not enough detail that I can believe karl.auerbach, October 23 @ 7:10 PM (0/0)
- Comments sjk, October 19 @ 7:37 AM (0/0)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:54 PM (0/0)
- Core Business hoffy, October 14 @ 6:45 PM (0/0)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy