Return to tldapps Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
| Username: |
dakearns |
| Date/Time: |
Wed, November 1, 2000 at 8:26 PM GMT |
| Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 95 |
| Score: |
5 |
| Subject: |
Privacy and Security |
Message: |
|
Mr. Auerbach:Suggest you
bone up on your LDAP (or generalized Directory principles) before questioning the
privacy implications of this proposal - nothing in the proposal compromises privacy
in any way. Data that can be read is data that is being explicitly exported for reading. As
to security, the folks at DIF and the Open Group are familiar enough with the arcane
workings of PKI that I'm confident they will insure the security of transactions
(although there should be no secure data being exchanged, at least initially). -dave
|
|
|
Message Thread:
- .dir Application by Novell, Inc. — Moderator, October 7 @ 10:27 PM (11/15)
- Support .DIR — dakearns, November 1 @ 8:38 PM (0/0)
- Directory vendor as .dir authority? — timoldham, November 1 @ 11:45 AM (2/2)
- Digital Identity — Tantric, October 26 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)
- Single TLD extension proposals — peniel, October 25 @ 11:16 PM (1/1)
- Compaq support for .DIR — garyfcampbell, October 25 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)
- Support for .DIR — cstone, October 24 @ 5:40 PM (0/0)
- Privacy and security and other questions — karl.auerbach, October 23 @ 9:32 PM (1/1)
- Privacy and Security — dakearns, November 1 @ 8:26 PM (0/0)
- To much gloss, not enough detail that I can believe — karl.auerbach, October 23 @ 7:10 PM (0/0)
- Comments — sjk, October 19 @ 7:37 AM (0/0)
- Proposition to ICANN, Applicants & Internet Community — Pistoff, October 18 @ 5:54 PM (0/0)
- Core Business — hoffy, October 14 @ 6:45 PM (0/0)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy