<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [alac] Analysis of .coop, .museum, and .aero renewals
- To: "Wendy Seltzer" <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [alac] Analysis of .coop, .museum, and .aero renewals
- From: "John R Levine" <johnl@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Dec 2005 22:08:45 -0500
> But then I've always thought sponsored TLDs were a bad idea.
I have to agree, particularly now that we have experience that
demonstrates that none of them attract enough registrants to be worth the
effort, although it would have been nice if .pro had worked.
Lacking sponsorship rules, setting up a domain should be like setting up a
CLEC, hit all the items on a checklist and you're in, with the easiest way
to do that being to hire a firm that specializes in setting them up.
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@xxxxxxxx, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, Mayor
"I shook hands with Senators Dole and Inouye," said Tom, disarmingly.
- References:
- [alac] Analysis of .coop, .museum, and .aero renewals
- Re: [alac] Analysis of .coop, .museum, and .aero renewals
- Re: [alac] Analysis of .coop, .museum, and .aero renewals
- Re: [alac] Analysis of .coop, .museum, and .aero renewals
- Re: [alac] Analysis of .coop, .museum, and .aero renewals
- Re: [alac] Analysis of .coop, .museum, and .aero renewals
- Re: [alac] Analysis of .coop, .museum, and .aero renewals
- Re: [alac] Analysis of .coop, .museum, and .aero renewals
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|