ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-arr-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: AW: [gnso-arr-dt] Draft permanent RT endorsement process

  • To: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx, owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx, cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx, william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: AW: [gnso-arr-dt] Draft permanent RT endorsement process
  • From: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 14:04:23 +0000

Looks good except two concerns. I think 10 hrs per week will be better 
understood than some cumulative number of days. We might want to mention the 
possibility of F2F meetings.

I also think it should include some deadline to the SGs to deliver their 
endorsements.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 10:57:12 
To: <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <cgreer@xxxxxxxxx>; <gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: AW: [gnso-arr-dt] Draft permanent RT endorsement process

Please find my edits/comments attached 



Regards
Wolf-Ulrich

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx] Im 
Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Mai 2010 21:37
An: William Drake
Cc: Caroline Greer; gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: RE: [gnso-arr-dt] Draft permanent RT endorsement process

Thanks for catching that Bill.  Here is the correct one.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 2:45 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: Caroline Greer; gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Draft permanent RT endorsement process
> 
> Hi
> 
> On May 25, 2010, at 8:35 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
> > Thanks Bill for getting this moving and thanks Caroline for your
> edits.
> > I added some suggested edits.
> 
> Chuck, the doc you attached is the old one from the accountability
> transparent team.  Luckily the edits from you shown are from February,
> so I think you just attached the wrong one rather than editing the
> wrong one.  Please send along your edits of today's version....
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-arr-
> dt@xxxxxxxxx]
> >> On Behalf Of Caroline Greer
> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 10:14 AM
> >> To: William Drake; gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: RE: [gnso-arr-dt] Draft permanent RT endorsement process
> >>
> >> Thanks Bill. I just caught a few small typos - revisions attached.
> 
> Thanks for catching these, as I said I was rushing. First one was a
> whopper.  2nd and 3rd we are two people divided by a common language,
> but I'll roll with whatever the group sense is. 4th and 5th agreed.
> 
> Chuck, I guess edit this version and resend?
> 
> Best,
> 
> Bill
> 
> >>
> >> We seem to have relaxed the gender diversity requirement? We
> > previously
> >> said no more than 2/3 coming from one gender and now we are saying
> the
> >> applicants can't all be of the one gender. That change is fine by
me
> >> but I just wondered if I had missed that discussion somewhere along
> > the
> >> way.
> >>
> >>
> >> Are we expecting the Council to be ready to vote on additional
> >> candidates if the diversity needs piece kicks in? It strikes me
that
> >> some preparation might need to be done if that need arises as I
> don't
> >> know if Councilors would be ready to vote on the call straight
away.
> >> Perhaps we can avoid this difficulty by doing some prep work
> > beforehand
> >> to figure out who will end up as being endorsed......or we see how
> we
> >> get on and if some folks aren't ready, we do a quick follow up
> Council
> >> call?
> >>
> >> Caroline.
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-arr-
> dt@xxxxxxxxx]
> >> On Behalf Of William Drake
> >> Sent: 25 May 2010 14:22
> >> To: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: [gnso-arr-dt] Draft permanent RT endorsement process
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Sorry, I'm really swamped with other stuff, so the attached was
> > drafted
> >> fairly quickly and may need some fine tuning of language.  But we
> >> needed somewhere to start, and I think it captures the points
people
> >> have raised in moving toward a simplified model; let me know if
not.
> >>
> >> Let's tinker and tweak and then get it off to the SGs for buy-in.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Bill
> >
> > <AoC RTs Process for GNSO Endorsements with Drake and Gomes
> edits.doc>
> 
> ***********************************************************
> William J. Drake
> Senior Associate
> Centre for International Governance
> Graduate Institute of International and
>  Development Studies
> Geneva, Switzerland
> william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
> ***********************************************************
> 






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy