RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] Baselines

["Milton L Mueller" <mueller@xxxxxxx>]

Philip:
We need to distinguish between "acceptable" and "preferred." 
It is not impossible to imagine circumstances in which people in my 
constituency would "accept" 4-4-4-4-3 if the alternative was something worse. 
I say that because I don't want to paint myself into a corner in the coming 
weeks.
--MM
 

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx on behalf of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Mon 7/7/2008 9:25 AM
To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] Baselines





For the sake of good order could we start the call today with an 
acknowledgement of what I
believe are the baselines of each party ?

(Setting aside the nom com votes for now and the changes we are proposing to 
reach a
compromise)

1. The BGC proposal of 4 4 4 4 would be:
- acceptable to the registries and the registrars
- NOT acceptable to the BC, IPC, ISP, NCUC and AL.

2. The Joint users proposal (amended to maintain contract parties separation) 
of 3 3 6 6
would be:
- NOT acceptable to the registries and the registrars ?
- acceptable to the BC, IPC, ISP, NCUC and AL.

Philip