RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] Nom Comm appointee roles

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Let me add one more to my list.  

5. I think there is value in having a chair that is independent of any
specific constituency; of course this is dependent on having NomCom reps
that have the leadership skills needed, which may not always be the
case.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 9:13 AM
> To: Philip Sheppard; gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] Nom Comm appointee roles 
> 
> 
> Your point is well taken Philip but I would offer the following:
> 
> 1. It will probably take quite awhile to achieve the BGC WG 
> goals of full stakeholder representation.
> 
> 2. It is likely that we will never achieve full stakeholder 
> representation for two reasons, 1) it is a huge task and 2) 
> it will constantly be changing.
> 
> 3. Even if we were able to achieve full stakeholder 
> representation, there will always be people within 
> stakeholder groups who are not involved in ICANN processes 
> and there independent perspective could be valuable.
> 
> 4. Certain kinds of expertise that are missing on the Council 
> at various times can be provided by NomCom reps.
> 
> Whether these are sufficient to sway the debate, we will have 
> to decide, but I do believe they are worthy of consideration.
> 
> Chuck
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> > [mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip 
> > Sheppard
> > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 3:36 AM
> > To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] Nom Comm appointee roles
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Lets move this argument away from personalities.
> > 
> > For me the logic gap in the concept of nomcom appointees is the 
> > following.
> > 
> > The new commercial users group is intended to outreach and 
> present a 
> > compromise position of the diverse views of the globe's commercial 
> > users.
> > The new non-commercial users group is intended to outreach 
> and present 
> > a compromise position of the diverse views of the globe's 
> > non-commercial users.
> > 
> > Just what perspective is left for NomCom delegates?
> > By what logic are three votes more relevant than a process that 
> > outreaches and presents a compromise position of the 
> diverse views of 
> > the globe's users?
> > 
> > Philip
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
>