Re: [gnso-idng] rethinking IDN gTLDs

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

I recall something similar based on the 
assumption that the outcomes of STI and other 
issues (such as vertical integration) that are 
still in flux would require a full fledged 
comment period. I do not recall the December date 
however, which is clearly unrealistic given the 
ongoing discussion process on (if nothing else) STI.
Perhaps December 2010? >:-}

Alan

At 01/12/2009 10:38 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
> It is my recollection that Kurt said exactly 
> this during both our Sunday pre-meeting GNSO 
> Council session and during one of the new gTLD 
> workshops he hosted on the Monday.
> Stéphane
>
> Le 1 déc. 2009 à 16:31, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :
>
> > Stephane,
> >
> > I don't recall the following at all from the Seoul meetings. From whom and
> > when did you hear this?  Besides, it would have been totally unrealistic to
> > suggest a timeline like this.
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >> I understood what staff told the
> >> community in Seoul to mean that the FAG (final AG - I've
> >> trademarked that acronym already I love it so much...) which
> >> was originally to come out in December, had been replaced by
> >> a DAGv4, still planned for December, with the FAG now planned
> >> for end of Q1 2010...
> >>
> >> Maybe we can get that a better idea of what is actually
> >> planned from staff.
> >>
> >> Stéphane