RE: [gnso-idng] rethinking IDN gTLDs

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Stephane,

You might want to confirm it with Kurt.  If he did, I totally missed it.

I was surprised that there was very little if anything said about timing and
DAG4 in Seoul.  But there were lots of things that painted the picture for
significant delays as was evidenced in the Public Forum on Thursday.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 10:38 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] rethinking IDN gTLDs
> 
> It is my recollection that Kurt said exactly this during both 
> our Sunday pre-meeting GNSO Council session and during one of 
> the new gTLD workshops he hosted on the Monday.
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> Le 1 déc. 2009 à 16:31, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :
> 
> > Stephane,
> > 
> > I don't recall the following at all from the Seoul 
> meetings. From whom 
> > and when did you hear this?  Besides, it would have been totally 
> > unrealistic to suggest a timeline like this.
> > 
> > Chuck
> > 
> >> I understood what staff told the
> >> community in Seoul to mean that the FAG (final AG - I've 
> trademarked 
> >> that acronym already I love it so much...) which was originally to 
> >> come out in December, had been replaced by a DAGv4, still 
> planned for 
> >> December, with the FAG now planned for end of Q1 2010...
> >> 
> >> Maybe we can get that a better idea of what is actually 
> planned from 
> >> staff.
> >> 
> >> Stéphane
> 
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature