Re: [gnso-idng] rethinking IDN gTLDs
Yes, you are right. And given the lack of information that we seem to have on this list, I intend to ask Kurt about it during the next Council meeting. Le 1 déc. 2009 à 19:40, Gomes, Chuck a écrit : > Stephane, > > You might want to confirm it with Kurt. If he did, I totally missed it. > > I was surprised that there was very little if anything said about timing and > DAG4 in Seoul. But there were lots of things that painted the picture for > significant delays as was evidenced in the Public Forum on Thursday. > > Chuck > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 10:38 AM >> To: Gomes, Chuck >> Cc: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] rethinking IDN gTLDs >> >> It is my recollection that Kurt said exactly this during both >> our Sunday pre-meeting GNSO Council session and during one of >> the new gTLD workshops he hosted on the Monday. >> >> Stéphane >> >> Le 1 déc. 2009 à 16:31, Gomes, Chuck a écrit : >> >>> Stephane, >>> >>> I don't recall the following at all from the Seoul >> meetings. From whom >>> and when did you hear this? Besides, it would have been totally >>> unrealistic to suggest a timeline like this. >>> >>> Chuck >>> >>>> I understood what staff told the >>>> community in Seoul to mean that the FAG (final AG - I've >> trademarked >>>> that acronym already I love it so much...) which was originally to >>>> come out in December, had been replaced by a DAGv4, still >> planned for >>>> December, with the FAG now planned for end of Q1 2010... >>>> >>>> Maybe we can get that a better idea of what is actually >> planned from >>>> staff. >>>> >>>> Stéphane >> >> Attachment:
smime.p7s
|