ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-idng]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-idng] rethinking IDN gTLDs

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] rethinking IDN gTLDs
  • From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:25:51 -0500


To offer a different example, an existing registry with an existing pre-validation process and eligibility model, could provide the pre-validation process and eligibility model -- "the policy" -- to an applicant for the same (or more culturally correct) string in a script other than Latin.

Chuck's example is an equivalence of a subset of a zone in a second or subsequent zones with a common operator.

My example is an equivalent policy across two or more zones with possibly distinct operators.

It is a challenge to find where user confusion arises in either planned plurality across multiple name spaces with a common operator, or policy consistency across multiple name spaces with disjoint operators.

In both cases, all domain names for the ASCII and IDN namespaces will have the same registrant, or no registrant. Of course, the underlying resource records may point to the registrant's script-specific resources.

Eric



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy