<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-idng] rethinking IDN gTLDs
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] rethinking IDN gTLDs
- From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:25:51 -0500
To offer a different example, an existing registry with an existing
pre-validation process and eligibility model, could provide the
pre-validation process and eligibility model -- "the policy" -- to an
applicant for the same (or more culturally correct) string in a script
other than Latin.
Chuck's example is an equivalence of a subset of a zone in a second or
subsequent zones with a common operator.
My example is an equivalent policy across two or more zones with
possibly distinct operators.
It is a challenge to find where user confusion arises in either
planned plurality across multiple name spaces with a common operator,
or policy consistency across multiple name spaces with disjoint operators.
In both cases, all domain names for the ASCII and IDN namespaces will
have the same registrant, or no registrant. Of course, the underlying
resource records may point to the registrant's script-specific resources.
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|