Re: AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] is anything happeing

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Wolf-Ulrich,

It seems that we were having an improvement implementation moment almost 
simultaneously and our email crossed paths.

I think I agree with you.  I think this team should get started.  And I agree, 
this SC should not take on any issue that has not yet been approved by the [O, 
PP] Steering Committee and approved by the Council.  But once the council has 
approved a recommendation from either the OSC or the PPSC, it should become 
this group's responsibility to review and deal with any issues.

a.



On 28 Sep 2010, at 10:47, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Avri and Philip,
> 
> The topic will be - again - on the next council meeting agenda. According to 
> the minutes item 8.3 of the last meeting OSC and PPSC shall be asked about 
> their opinion how to proceed. I'd prefer having one team overseeing the whole 
> implementation phase instead of different ones.
> 
> The OSC and its related subteams seem to be closer to fulfil their tasks than 
> the PDP working team, so implementation could start regarding the OSC related 
> recommendations. PPSC could follow later.
> 
> I'd be glad getting some inout for the next council meeting on 07 Oct.
> 
> Best regards
> Wolf-Ulrich 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Avri Doria
> Gesendet: Montag, 20. September 2010 15:29
> An: Gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] is anything happeing
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Well we are seeing some implementation related issues on the Council 
> Operations WT already to do with SOI/DOI and Proxy voting.  So I was 
> wondering does looking at those issue belong there, with the policy already 
> having been approved, or here.  While the WT has not completed all its work 
> while waiting on some issues related to revealing the staff contracting list, 
> it had completed the SOI/DOI and Proxy stuff.
> 
> a.
> 
> On 20 Sep 2010, at 09:19, Philip Sheppard wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Hello Avri,
>> I was wondering a little the same thing and have a suggestion.
>> 
>> First, I believe we should see the PPSC and OSC wind up and their sub teams
>> disappear shortly as the first wave of proposals are adopted.
>> Any referrals from the GNSO on the lines of "this don't work" I would hope 
>> would
>> come to this new group and not back to the OSC or PPSC teams and that would 
>> seem
>> to be duplication.
>> 
>> Second,
>> I am comfortable with a gap between the GNSO trying implementation and then
>> finding issues with which this group could help.
>> So the fact there is no work yet is to be expected - its simply too soon.
>> 
>> Philip
>> 
> 
>