RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Submission from an ALAC member

[Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Mary,

Thank you for this, apology noted.

Kindest regards

Nathalie

From: owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: mercredi 26 septembre 2012 20:38
To: GNSO IOC RC DT
Subject: RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Submission from an ALAC member


All, I am stuck in another meeting and apologize for both missing the call and 
the very late notice.


Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php 
<http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php%0d>
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: 
http://ssrn.com/author=437584


>>>

From:


Nathalie Peregrine 
<nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>>


To:


"J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>>, GNSO 
IOC RC DT <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>>


Date:


9/26/2012 11:53 AM


Subject:


RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Submission from an ALAC member

Dear J. Scott,

Apology noted.

Kind regards

Nathalie

From: owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx]<mailto:[mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx]>
 On Behalf Of J. Scott Evans
Sent: mercredi 26 septembre 2012 17:41
To: GNSO IOC RC DT
Subject: Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Submission from an ALAC member

Dear All:

I will not be able to make today's scheduled call because I am giving a speech 
at that time.  Greg is not able to make it due to the holiday.  Accordingly, I 
want to put forth the input of the IPC on the call for consensus.

The IPC does not believe that a PDP is necessary.  We feel that the purpose of 
the DT was to refine implementation details to enact the GAC advice concerning 
additional protections for the IOC/RC names on the first and second levels.  In 
fact, we did make specific recommendations with regard to additional 
protections on the top level.

Unfortunately, there is no consensus in the DT to provide the same type of 
recommendations on the second level.  In contrast, the rough consensus is that 
the DT should recommend a PDP.  While we disagree with this position, we 
believe it is an acceptable compromise to accede to the recommendation for a 
PDP so long as there is a temporary reservations of the IOC/RC names on the 
second level pending the outcome of the recommended PDP.

I would appreciate if this statement were made a part of the record for today's 
call.

I am sorry to have to miss today's call.

J. Scott

j. scott evans -  head of global brand, domains & copyright - Yahoo! Inc. - 
408.349.1385 - jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>

________________________________
From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>>
To: GNSO IOC RC DT <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 7:04 AM
Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Submission from an ALAC member

I have been asked to pass this document on to the IOC/RC Drafting Team on 
behalf of Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro (aka Sala), an ALAC member from Fiji.

It represents her views and has not been endorsed by the ALAC, and I submit it 
without further comment.

Alan