RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1

["Claudio Di Gangi" <CDiGangi@xxxxxxxx>]

Dear Olga and fellow work team members,

 

Sorry I had to miss our last call; I was (un)fortunately on vacation in
Mexico at the time. :-)

 

I believe I agree and like what you were trying to accomplish with these
changes; however the language is now unclear to me. Specifically my
question is, as currently written, what is the difference between #1 and
#2.

 

"1. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation in a
constituency for each stakeholder group." and 

"2. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation for members
in a constituency. " 

 

Thanks for attempting to clarify

 

Claudio

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 10:07 AM
To: Michael Young; Victoria McEvedy; Papac, Krista;
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask
1

 

Neutral is fine.  I thought 'new' was being added when maybe the red
meant deleted.  My mistake.

 

Chuck

         

        
________________________________


        From: Michael Young [mailto:myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 10:02 AM
        To: Gomes, Chuck; 'Victoria McEvedy'; 'Papac, Krista';
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; 'OSC-CSG Work Team'
        Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1,
Subtask 1

        Victoria I understood your edits were to remove the "new" and
just make the statements neutral as to either new or existing
constituencies?  Chuck do you mean to more specific? Rather than neutral
maybe it should just read as follows:

         

        "1. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation in a
new or existing constituency for each stakeholder group." and 

        "2. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation for
new or existing members in a constituency. " 

         

         

         

        Best Regards,

         

        Michael Young

         

        Vice-President,

        Product Development

        Afilias

        O: +14166734109

        C: +16472891220

         

        From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: April-22-09 9:52 AM
        To: Michael Young; Victoria McEvedy; Papac, Krista;
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
        Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1,
Subtask 1

         

        Please note that our tasks with regard to constituency
operations relates to both existing and new constituencies.  So to the
extent that the new wording eliminates existing constituencies, I don't
think it works.  But maybe I am misunderstanding something.  I strongly
believe that we seriously need to discuss this in our meeting and that
that will be much more effective.

         

        Chuck

                 

                
________________________________


                From: Michael Young [mailto:myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
                Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 8:33 AM
                To: 'Victoria McEvedy'; 'Papac, Krista'; Gomes, Chuck;
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; 'OSC-CSG Work Team'
                Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan
Task 1, Subtask 1

                I think Victoria's point is quite valid and therefore
support the language with her edit.

                 

                Best Regards,

                 

                Michael Young

                 

                Vice-President,

                Product Development

                Afilias

                O: +14166734109

                C: +16472891220

                 

                From: Victoria McEvedy [mailto:victoria@xxxxxxxxxx] 
                Sent: April-22-09 2:55 AM
                To: Papac, Krista; Gomes, Chuck; jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx;
OSC-CSG Work Team
                Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan
Task 1, Subtask 1

                 

                As to the language issue, I do think we should discuss
on our call the carve out issue first -ie are there any aspects of the
BGC's report and recommendations on constituency structure:
inclusiveness, effectiveness and efficiency (see pages 39-46) that
anyone considers are not in our remit? If so why? 

                 

                I am happy with the changes below -with the deletion of
the words NEW in each case -as our recommendations will apply to
existing constituencies just as to new ones. 

                 

                I would like to suggest a way to combine these
recommendations, whereby we adopt the recommendation made by S.S., but
keep the existing item 1, as suggested by Olga and Michael, and also
change the text as suggested by Victoria.  Here is the suggested text: 

                 

                "1. Develop guidance, rules or principles for
participation in a new constituency for each stakeholder group." and 

                "2. Develop guidance, rules or principles for
participation for new members in a constituency. " 

                 

                 

                 

                 

                Victoria McEvedy

                Principal 

                McEvedys

                Solicitors and Attorneys 

                 

                 

                96 Westbourne Park Road 

                London 

                W2 5PL

                 

                T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

                F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

                M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

                 

                www.mcevedy.eu  

                Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

                This email and its attachments are confidential and
intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its
attachments may also be legally privileged. If you have received this in
error, please let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and
its attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.

                This email does not create a solicitor-client
relationship and no retainer is created by this email communication. 

                 

                From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Papac, Krista
                Sent: 22 April 2009 02:27
                To: Gomes, Chuck; jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work
Team
                Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan
Task 1, Subtask 1

                 

                Sorry all.  I am just catching up.  I, too, am fine with
1 and 2 below.

                 

                Julie, thank you for the well articulated outline of the
various suggestions.

                 

                Krista Papac 
                Sales Executive 
                Iron Mountain Digital 
                5530 Bandini Blvd 
                Bell, CA  90201  US 
                Home Office: +001.714.846.8780 
                Mobile: +001.646.379.4689 
                Fax: +001.323.443.3573 
                krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  

                Visit the new www.ironmountain.com
<http://www.ironmountain.com/>  
                Tour Iron Mountain
<http://www.ironmountain.com/US/services/tours/corporate.asp>  

                (c) 2008 Iron Mountain Incorporated. All rights
reserved. Iron Mountain and the design of the mountain are registered
trademarks of Iron Mountain Incorporated. 

                Iron Mountain Privacy Policy: 
http://www.ironmountain.com/legal/privacy.asp  Iron Mountain, 745
Atlantic Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111 www.ironmountain.com
<http://www.ironmountain.com/> 

                
________________________________


                From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
                Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 4:04 PM
                To: jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
                Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan
Task 1, Subtask 1

                 

                I am fine with the latest suggested wording for 1 and 2
below.

                 

                Chuck

                         

                        
________________________________


                        From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
                        Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 2:56 PM
                        To: OSC-CSG Work Team
                        Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team
Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1

                        Dear Work Team Members,

                         

                        We have had a very helpful discussion on the
email list that has produced several recommendations to amend the
language in Task 1, Subtask 1, of our work plan.  Here are the
recommendations:

                         

                        1.  S.S. recommends changing: 

                         

                        "1.  Develop guidelines for defining admission
decision procedures for a new constituency for each stakeholder group."
to: 

                        "1.  Develop guidelines for defining admission
decision procedures for a new member for each constituency."

                         

                        2.  Victoria noted that the language she
suggested and that we all agreed  to was: 

                         

                        "Develop guidance, rules or principles for
participation..." to replace "template for admission decision
procedures..." 

                         

                        3.  Olga and Michael suggested that there could
be two items -- a revised item 1 and a new item 2 as follows: 

                         

                        "1.  Develop guidelines for defining admission
decision procedures for a new constituency to a stakeholder group." and 

                        "2. Develop guidelines for defining admission
decision procedures for a new member for each constituency."  

                         

                        I would like to suggest a way to combine these
recommendations, whereby we adopt the recommendation made by S.S., but
keep the existing item 1, as suggested by Olga and Michael, and also
change the text as suggested by Victoria.  Here is the suggested text: 

                         

                        "1. Develop guidance, rules or principles for
participation in a new constituency for each stakeholder group." and 

                        "2. Develop guidance, rules or principles for
participation for new members in a constituency. " 

                         

                        I welcome your comments and suggestions.  Thank
you.  

                         

                        Best regards, 

                         

                        Julie

                        Julie Hedlund

                        Policy Consultant

                         

                
________________________________


                The information contained in this email message and its
attachments is intended only for the private and confidential use of the
recipient(s) named above, unless the sender expressly agrees otherwise.
Transmission of email over the Internet is not a secure communications
medium. If you are requesting or have requested the transmittal of
personal data, as defined in applicable privacy laws by means of email
or in an attachment to email you must select a more secure alternate
means of transmittal that supports your obligations to protect such
personal data. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient and/or you have received this email in error, you must take no
action based on the information in this email and you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, misuse, copying, or disclosure of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by email and delete
the original message.