RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Do we really mean 'participation' or should we be talking about
membership eligibility?  For example:
 
1. Develop guidlines, rules or principles for constituency membership in
stakeholder groups, and
2. Develop guidelines, rules or principles for membership in
constituencies.
 
I am not sure it is our task to recommenda how constituencies should
participate in SGs or for that matter how individuals or organizations
should participate in constituencies, but I believe the Board definitely
want reasonably open membership for SGs and constituencies.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: Claudio Di Gangi [mailto:CDiGangi@xxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 10:03 AM
        To: Gomes, Chuck; Michael Young; Victoria McEvedy; Papac,
Krista; jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
        Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1,
Subtask 1
        
        

        Dear Team,

         

        After re-reading the thread, I believe I better understand the
text. Perhaps the following small tweak makes the language more clear:

         

        "1. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation for
constituencies across stakeholder groups." and 

        "2. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation for
members in a constituency. " 

         

        Claudio

         

        
________________________________


        From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
        Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 10:07 AM
        To: Michael Young; Victoria McEvedy; Papac, Krista;
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
        Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1,
Subtask 1

         

        Neutral is fine.  I thought 'new' was being added when maybe the
red meant deleted.  My mistake.

         

        Chuck

                 

                
________________________________


                From: Michael Young [mailto:myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
                Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 10:02 AM
                To: Gomes, Chuck; 'Victoria McEvedy'; 'Papac, Krista';
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; 'OSC-CSG Work Team'
                Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan
Task 1, Subtask 1

                Victoria I understood your edits were to remove the
"new" and just make the statements neutral as to either new or existing
constituencies?  Chuck do you mean to more specific? Rather than neutral
maybe it should just read as follows:

                 

                "1. Develop guidance, rules or principles for
participation in a new or existing constituency for each stakeholder
group." and 

                "2. Develop guidance, rules or principles for
participation for new or existing members in a constituency. " 

                 

                 

                 

                Best Regards,

                 

                Michael Young

                 

                Vice-President,

                Product Development

                Afilias

                O: +14166734109

                C: +16472891220

                 

                From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
                Sent: April-22-09 9:52 AM
                To: Michael Young; Victoria McEvedy; Papac, Krista;
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
                Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan
Task 1, Subtask 1

                 

                Please note that our tasks with regard to constituency
operations relates to both existing and new constituencies.  So to the
extent that the new wording eliminates existing constituencies, I don't
think it works.  But maybe I am misunderstanding something.  I strongly
believe that we seriously need to discuss this in our meeting and that
that will be much more effective.

                 

                Chuck

                         

                        
________________________________


                        From: Michael Young
[mailto:myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
                        Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 8:33 AM
                        To: 'Victoria McEvedy'; 'Papac, Krista'; Gomes,
Chuck; jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; 'OSC-CSG Work Team'
                        Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team
Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1

                        I think Victoria's point is quite valid and
therefore support the language with her edit.

                         

                        Best Regards,

                         

                        Michael Young

                         

                        Vice-President,

                        Product Development

                        Afilias

                        O: +14166734109

                        C: +16472891220

                         

                        From: Victoria McEvedy
[mailto:victoria@xxxxxxxxxx] 
                        Sent: April-22-09 2:55 AM
                        To: Papac, Krista; Gomes, Chuck;
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
                        Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team
Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1

                         

                        As to the language issue, I do think we should
discuss on our call the carve out issue first -ie are there any aspects
of the BGC's report and recommendations on constituency structure:
inclusiveness, effectiveness and efficiency (see pages 39-46) that
anyone considers are not in our remit? If so why? 

                         

                        I am happy with the changes below -with the
deletion of the words NEW in each case -as our recommendations will
apply to existing constituencies just as to new ones. 

                         

                        I would like to suggest a way to combine these
recommendations, whereby we adopt the recommendation made by S.S., but
keep the existing item 1, as suggested by Olga and Michael, and also
change the text as suggested by Victoria.  Here is the suggested text: 

                         

                        "1. Develop guidance, rules or principles for
participation in a new constituency for each stakeholder group." and 

                        "2. Develop guidance, rules or principles for
participation for new members in a constituency. " 

                         

                         

                         

                         

                        Victoria McEvedy

                        Principal 

                        McEvedys

                        Solicitors and Attorneys 

                         

                         

                        96 Westbourne Park Road 

                        London 

                        W2 5PL

                         

                        T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

                        F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

                        M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

                         

                        www.mcevedy.eu  

                        Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority
#465972

                        This email and its attachments are confidential
and intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and
its attachments may also be legally privileged. If you have received
this in error, please let us know by reply immediately and destroy the
email and its attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the
contents.

                        This email does not create a solicitor-client
relationship and no retainer is created by this email communication. 

                         

                        From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Papac, Krista
                        Sent: 22 April 2009 02:27
                        To: Gomes, Chuck; jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG
Work Team
                        Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team
Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1

                         

                        Sorry all.  I am just catching up.  I, too, am
fine with 1 and 2 below.

                         

                        Julie, thank you for the well articulated
outline of the various suggestions.

                         

                        Krista Papac 
                        Sales Executive 
                        Iron Mountain Digital 
                        5530 Bandini Blvd 
                        Bell, CA  90201  US 
                        Home Office: +001.714.846.8780 
                        Mobile: +001.646.379.4689 
                        Fax: +001.323.443.3573 
                        krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  

                        Visit the new www.ironmountain.com
<http://www.ironmountain.com/>  
                        Tour Iron Mountain
<http://www.ironmountain.com/US/services/tours/corporate.asp>  

                        (c) 2008 Iron Mountain Incorporated. All rights
reserved. Iron Mountain and the design of the mountain are registered
trademarks of Iron Mountain Incorporated. 

                        Iron Mountain Privacy Policy: 
http://www.ironmountain.com/legal/privacy.asp  Iron Mountain, 745
Atlantic Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111 www.ironmountain.com
<http://www.ironmountain.com/> 

                        
________________________________


                        From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
                        Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 4:04 PM
                        To: jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
                        Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team
Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1

                         

                        I am fine with the latest suggested wording for
1 and 2 below.

                         

                        Chuck

                                 

                                
________________________________


                                From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
                                Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 2:56 PM
                                To: OSC-CSG Work Team
                                Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work
Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1

                                Dear Work Team Members,

                                 

                                We have had a very helpful discussion on
the email list that has produced several recommendations to amend the
language in Task 1, Subtask 1, of our work plan.  Here are the
recommendations:

                                 

                                1.  S.S. recommends changing: 

                                 

                                "1.  Develop guidelines for defining
admission decision procedures for a new constituency for each
stakeholder group."  to: 

                                "1.  Develop guidelines for defining
admission decision procedures for a new member for each constituency."

                                 

                                2.  Victoria noted that the language she
suggested and that we all agreed  to was: 

                                 

                                "Develop guidance, rules or principles
for participation..." to replace "template for admission decision
procedures..." 

                                 

                                3.  Olga and Michael suggested that
there could be two items -- a revised item 1 and a new item 2 as
follows: 

                                 

                                "1.  Develop guidelines for defining
admission decision procedures for a new constituency to a stakeholder
group." and 

                                "2. Develop guidelines for defining
admission decision procedures for a new member for each constituency."  

                                 

                                I would like to suggest a way to combine
these recommendations, whereby we adopt the recommendation made by S.S.,
but keep the existing item 1, as suggested by Olga and Michael, and also
change the text as suggested by Victoria.  Here is the suggested text: 

                                 

                                "1. Develop guidance, rules or
principles for participation in a new constituency for each stakeholder
group." and 

                                "2. Develop guidance, rules or
principles for participation for new members in a constituency. " 

                                 

                                I welcome your comments and suggestions.
Thank you.  

                                 

                                Best regards, 

                                 

                                Julie

                                Julie Hedlund

                                Policy Consultant

                                 

                        
________________________________


                        The information contained in this email message
and its attachments is intended only for the private and confidential
use of the recipient(s) named above, unless the sender expressly agrees
otherwise. Transmission of email over the Internet is not a secure
communications medium. If you are requesting or have requested the
transmittal of personal data, as defined in applicable privacy laws by
means of email or in an attachment to email you must select a more
secure alternate means of transmittal that supports your obligations to
protect such personal data. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient and/or you have received this email in error, you
must take no action based on the information in this email and you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, misuse, copying, or disclosure
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by email and delete
the original message.