<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] For your review - Updated Charter & Doodle poll
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] For your review - Updated Charter & Doodle poll
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:47:07 +0000
I like the change below a lot, in response to Eric's comments.
Chuck
From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 4:12 PM
To: gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] For your review - Updated Charter & Doodle
poll
i like your changes too, Chuck. i found a couple things that i missed the
first time around and have added those to the mix.
i've also taken a run at the two points that Eric raised -- the second one
(page 2, bullet 4 of the "tasked" list) is substantive, so people should pay
special attention to that one. here are the two versions:
original:
including criteria for when something is to be considered policy
and when it should be considered implementation
after:
Criteria to be used to determine when an action should be addressed
by a policy process and when it should be considered implementation
mikey
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|