RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Different diversity requirements between the Houses

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

My suggestion was to allow for exceptions if there is justification was
not a general rule.  Hopefully, you are right Philip, that even
registries will have a good global spread in the future.  But until that
happens, allowing for possible exceptions could facilitate selection of
the best overall candidates considering all factors, not just one, in
cases where that one factor is unachievable without creative gaming.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 8:19 AM
> To: Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Different diversity requirements 
> between the Houses
> 
> 
> 
> As a starting point it seems reasonable that rules apply to 
> both Houses.
> When they do not that difference needs to be justified.
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Q: Is there a significant geographical diversity difference 
> between the two Houses?
> A: 
> The Users House has a global spread.
> The registrars have a global spread.
> The registries (if not today then soon with unlimited TLD 
> expansion) could be reasonably expected to have a global spread.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> It does not seem therefore that a difference is justified.
> 
> 
>