RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Naming the Houses
- To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Naming the Houses
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 14:00:47 -0400
Are you suggesting Philip that "Users House" is a reasonable name?
[mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 8:12 AM
Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] Naming the Houses
There are two primary objections to "Non-contracting parties
a) The world outside ICANN
We are often too intro-spective when we discuss ICANN issues.
For me, as someone involved for most of my time in non-ICANN
issues I frequently explain to senior policy makers and CEOs what ICANN
Using language to describe a group such as "Users" communicates
to these people.
"Non-contracting" requires a detailed understanding of ICANN.
As professionals engaged in a political and economic process we
do not wish to be known for what we are NOT.
We wish to be known for what we are.