RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] CIG and Individuals

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Unless of course we consider the Board's GNSO Improvements
Recommendations as top down rules.  Personally, I see them as guidelines
for which we need to develop implementation plans, but they are
guidelines I don't think we can ignore.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 3:16 AM
> To: Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] CIG and Individuals
> 
> 
> Alain, your concern is null and void.
> you just said you wanted a home for "a new class of 
> entrepreneurs that the web economy has created".
> By that you mean entrepreneurs who have "demonstrated 
> commercial intent".
> I believe I explained the BC test as being "a demonstration 
> of commercial intent".
> Our philosophy is one of inclusion.
> 
> And I do agree with you, we do not need top-down rules from 
> unaffected third parties telling others how to run a constituency.
> There are more pressing matters for the OSC.
> 
> Philip
> 
>