<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] name of the House
- To: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, "Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] name of the House
- From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 17:37:24 +1000
Sorry I haven't been too vocal on this. Bloody busy!
Don't forget that in the "new world" IBM could be the Registry, Registrar AND
Registrant for their TLD.
Where do they sit? Everywhere? Perhaps they should start an ISP and a non
profit too ;)
Adrian Kinderis
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Wednesday, 13 May 2009 5:10 PM
To: Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] name of the House
Avri suggested:
How about keeping Contracted Parties for the contracted parties since
they seem happy with it and using Registrants and Users (or perhaps
Registrants, Users , and Services) for the other house.
---------------------
Users & Services works for me.
NCUC ?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|