RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] name of the House

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In the latest Institutional Confidence draft document prepared by the
PSC, it was stated that participation should be allowed in different
groups as long as voting was only allowed in one: "1.13.4 Create a
framework which allows cross participation in Supporting
Organizations, Advisory Committees and/or constituencies, but which
prohibits
and considers sanctions for voting by the same individual or
organization in
more than one ICANN entity."

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Adrian Kinderis
> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 3:37 AM
> To: Philip Sheppard; Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] name of the House
> 
> 
> Sorry I haven't been too vocal on this. Bloody busy!
> 
> Don't forget that in the "new world" IBM could be the 
> Registry, Registrar AND Registrant for their TLD.
> 
> Where do they sit? Everywhere? Perhaps they should start an 
> ISP and a non profit too ;)
> 
> Adrian Kinderis
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Wednesday, 13 May 2009 5:10 PM
> To: Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] name of the House
> 
> 
> Avri suggested:
> How about keeping Contracted Parties for the contracted 
> parties since they seem happy with it and using Registrants 
> and Users  (or perhaps Registrants, Users , and Services) for 
> the other house.
> ---------------------
> Users & Services works for me. 
> 
> NCUC ?
> 
> 
> 
> 
>