ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-restruc-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] name of the House

  • To: "Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] name of the House
  • From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 10:06:43 -0400


In the current world, it is common for (as an example) an ISP to also be a registrar and the Bylaws allow them to fully participate in both Constituencies (Section 5, Article 3: "No individual or entity shall be excluded from participation in a Constituency merely because of participation in another Constituency").

In the revised Bylaws, staff has suggested that this sentence be removed (with no objections to date) so IBM would simply have to choose which is most important to them.

Alan

At 13/05/2009 03:37 AM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:

Sorry I haven't been too vocal on this. Bloody busy!

Don't forget that in the "new world" IBM could be the Registry, Registrar AND Registrant for their TLD.

Where do they sit? Everywhere? Perhaps they should start an ISP and a non profit too ;)

Adrian Kinderis

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Wednesday, 13 May 2009 5:10 PM
To: Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] name of the House


Avri suggested:
How about keeping Contracted Parties for the contracted parties since
they seem happy with it and using Registrants and Users  (or perhaps
Registrants, Users , and Services) for the other house.
---------------------
Users & Services works for me.

NCUC ?





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy