RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] name of the House

[Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Chuck and Alan for the clarification.

My point was more directed at the naming of the House as defined by its 
purported constituents.

Adrian Kinderis

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Thursday, 14 May 2009 12:07 AM
To: Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] name of the House


In the current world, it is common for (as an example) an ISP to also 
be a registrar and the Bylaws allow them to fully participate in both 
Constituencies (Section 5, Article 3: "No individual or entity shall 
be excluded from participation in a Constituency merely because of 
participation in another Constituency").

In the revised Bylaws, staff has suggested that this sentence be 
removed (with no objections to date) so IBM would simply have to 
choose which is most important to them.

Alan

At 13/05/2009 03:37 AM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:

>Sorry I haven't been too vocal on this. Bloody busy!
>
>Don't forget that in the "new world" IBM could be the Registry, 
>Registrar AND Registrant for their TLD.
>
>Where do they sit? Everywhere? Perhaps they should start an ISP and 
>a non profit too ;)
>
>Adrian Kinderis
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
>[mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
>Sent: Wednesday, 13 May 2009 5:10 PM
>To: Gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [gnso-restruc-dt] name of the House
>
>
>Avri suggested:
>How about keeping Contracted Parties for the contracted parties since
>they seem happy with it and using Registrants and Users  (or perhaps
>Registrants, Users , and Services) for the other house.
>---------------------
>Users & Services works for me.
>
>NCUC ?