RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q5 diversity by-law

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

That's what I tried to do below.  You only need an exception if you 
want two members from the same region but have not yet reach 5 
regions represented. Except my wording does not require a change if 
ICANN changes the number of regions.
Alan

At 07/06/2009 03:23 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> No Alan.  Maybe I didn't word it effectively.  What I tried to say was
> that each SG would only have to have different regions for 3 reps for
> the contracted SGs and 5 reps for the noncontracted SGs.  Can someone
> suggest a better to way to say it?
>
> Chuck
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> > Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 11:55 AM
> > To: gnso-restruc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [gnso-restruc-dt] Q5 diversity by-law
> >
> >
> > As I read that, the non-contracted SGs would need an
> > exemption potentially every year (assuming we stay at 5
> > regions), effectively meaning that the entire Council must
> > approve one of their Councillors. I find that wrong on several counts.
> >
> > Also the "up to the number of seats allocated for that SG" is
> > really redundant - there is no way to go above, and the
> > previous part of the sentence covers all below the limit. I
> > think a simple change in that phrase addresses both issues.
> >
> > "Each GNSO Stakeholder Group (SG) Council Representative
> > shall be selected from a different ICANN geographic region up
> > to the number of ICANN regions. Any exceptions to this
> > requirement shall require a 2/3 vote of both houses but in no
> > case shall more than two representatives come from the same
> > geographic region."
> >
> > Alan
> >
> > At 07/06/2009 09:59 AM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> > >If all of the above are true, then here is some possible language:
> > >
> > >"Each GNSO Stakeholder Group (SG) Council Representative shall be
> > >selected from a different ICANN geographic region up to the
> > number of
> > >seats allocated for that SG.  Any exceptions to this
> > requirement shall
> > >require a 2/3 vote of both houses but in no case shall more than two
> > >representatives come from the same geographic region."
> > >
> > >Thoughts?
> >
> >