<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-travel-dt] Re: TRAVEL DRAFTING TEAM COMMENTS NEEDED - Travel funding request from the Vertical Integration WG co-chairs
- To: gnso-travel-dt@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-travel-dt] Re: TRAVEL DRAFTING TEAM COMMENTS NEEDED - Travel funding request from the Vertical Integration WG co-chairs
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 13:10:54 -0400
Hi,
Have the council liaison chair the meeting with the assistance of the Policy
Staff coordinator for the Working Group?
Note: it may not be a willingness to pay, it may also be the ability to pay.
a.
On 25 May 2010, at 13:07, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
> What should we do if none of the co-chairs are willing to pay their own way
> to come?
>
> Le 25 mai 2010 à 18:31, Avri Doria a écrit :
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> If at least one of the co-chairs will be there. I am probably ok with the
>> answer. And assuming that there will be good remote facilities in the
>> meeting room, the WG should be able to get by.
>>
>> a.
>>
>> On 25 May 2010, at 12:23, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
>>
>>> You make a good point and I was asking myself the same question. We can
>>> work on a long-term solution, but I frankly don't see any way of coming up
>>> with one for this short term need.
>>>
>>> I was thinking I should go back to the VI co-chairs and tell them that
>>> there's really nothing that can be done at such short notice.
>>>
>>> Do people agree with that approach?
>>>
>>> Stéphane
>>>
>>> Le 25 mai 2010 à 18:18, Avri Doria a écrit :
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 25 May 2010, at 09:16, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> But I think the important point here is: can the Council as a whole step
>>>>> in and donate a slot in cases such as these, and would that be a fair and
>>>>> practical way of dealing with issues such as this one?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Something like:
>>>>
>>>> Every SG will donate N (orN/2 depending on the number of slots available
>>>> to the SG) travel slots a year for emergency needs such as getting a WG
>>>> chair to a meeting? And if this is what the team decides I will take it
>>>> back to the NCSG with my personal support (yes and including the
>>>> recommendation that we would do our fair share)
>>>>
>>>> But who would go first to solve the issue this time? Obviously sometimes
>>>> the person is a member of a particular SG group so hopefully they can do
>>>> this. But sometime she or he won't be.
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise, are there any suggestions on the way to solve this since mine
>>>> seems so very shot down.
>>>>
>>>> a.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|