<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Updated Charter Based on Today's Call
- To: "Berry Cobb" <berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Updated Charter Based on Today's Call
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:52:42 +0100
Thanks Berry.
Stéphane
Le 11 févr. 2010 à 19:12, Berry Cobb a écrit :
> VI Team,
>
> My suggestion is a combination of Avri's & Milton's definition for CO. If I
> recall from the Adobe chat, Avri could accept the combination.
>
> My tweek:
>
> Cross ownership" (CO) is defined as the controlling or minority ownership of
> a share of a registry by a registrar, or vice-versa and exists in two forms:
> · An entity operating with contractual and functional separation and
> equal access arrangements required by ICANN policies & contracts – or –
> · An entity operating without contractual and functional separation
> and is not required to offer equal access
>
> Perhaps my use of “entity” could use some adjustment.
>
> Thanks, B
>
>
> Berry A. Cobb
> Infinity Portals LLC
> 866.921.8891
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Margie Milam
> Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 13:10
> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Updated Charter Based on Today's Call
>
> Dear All,
>
> Attached please find a revised charter, which is redlined to include the
> comments received on today's call. I will update the WIKI, but thought it
> would be useful for you to see the changes in a word document as well.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Margie
>
> ____________
>
> Margie Milam
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN
> ____________
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 12:50 PM
> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Main deadlines following today's call
>
>
> Thanks to all for your participation in today's call.
>
> Just a quick reminder of the deadlines we set for ourselves during the call.
>
> Suggestions for both the objectives and the definitions should be submitted
> to this list NLT Thursday Feb, 11. Discussions and edits to these should end
> Monday Feb 15. Staff and I will then work to turn the team's consensus points
> into final objectives and definitions for the charter by Tuesday Feb 16.
>
> During this period, I would also encourage any comments on the rest of the
> proposed charter, i.e. the milestones.
>
> I would like to be able to aim for a finalised charter by the end of next
> week, i.e. Friday Feb 19.
>
> Margie, would you please start the discussion off by sending to the list the
> edited/amended versions of the objectives and definitions as discussed during
> today's call?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stéphane
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|