<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: A Call to Harms
- To: "gn >> \"'Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx'\"" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: A Call to Harms
- From: Volker Greimann - Key-Systems GmbH <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:26:05 +0200
Hi Jeff,
just for clarification:
Do you feel, as you write, that VI/CO _does_ have harmful effects, or
just that it _can_ have harmful effects?
If it is the latter, would you not agree that instead of limiting every
new registry inrterested in VI/CO models it would be much more sensible
to just prevent those harmful effects?
I did not want this group to delve into these issues because frankly
some of us feel like VI/CO does have harmful effects, some do not. We
are not going to change minds here in this group. We are trying to
find compromise. Simply bringing up these old arguments about the
harms and benefits of integration is in my mind not a useful exercise
until we can actually have real studies done by non-interested parties
(which is a long term objective).
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
--
Best regards,
Volker A. Greimann
Key-Systems GmbH
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|