ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: A Call to Harms

  • To: "gn >> \"'Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx'\"" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: A Call to Harms
  • From: Volker Greimann - Key-Systems GmbH <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:26:05 +0200


Hi Jeff,

just for clarification:

Do you feel, as you write, that VI/CO _does_ have harmful effects, or just that it _can_ have harmful effects? If it is the latter, would you not agree that instead of limiting every new registry inrterested in VI/CO models it would be much more sensible to just prevent those harmful effects?

I did not want this group to delve into these issues because frankly some of us feel like VI/CO does have harmful effects, some do not. We are not going to change minds here in this group. We are trying to find compromise. Simply bringing up these old arguments about the harms and benefits of integration is in my mind not a useful exercise until we can actually have real studies done by non-interested parties (which is a long term objective).

Jeffrey J. Neuman

Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy

--

Best regards,

Volker A. Greimann

Key-Systems GmbH





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy