RE: [soac-mapo] Revised draft Charter Terms of Reference for your review

[Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

okay. Marilyn 



Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] Revised draft Charter Terms of Reference for your 
review
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 08:49:29 -0400
From: cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To: jon@xxxxxxxxxx; stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx
CC: soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx

















Does anyone object to this change?

 

Chuck

 







From:
owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jon
Nevett

Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 7:09 AM

To: Stéphane Van Gelder

Cc: soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Revised draft Charter Terms of Reference for
your review





 



I support Stephane's suggestion.  Thanks.  Jon



 





On Aug 24, 2010, at 7:00 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:











Thanks Liz,



 





I would like to suggest the word "preliminary" be
stricken from the very last sentence of this document (shown in red below):





 





"The Rec6 CWG should deliver a preliminary
report with comments from the GNSO, ALAC, and GAC not later than 13 September
2010 to meet the 11-day advance publication that the Board requests for its
retreat on new gTLDs."





 





While I understand from Frank's comments sent to the list
yesterday that replacing it with the word "final" would be worrisome
for the GAC, I do think the group's focus should be on meeting the deadline
de-facto imposed on it by the Board retreat.





 





Leaving "preliminary" in there implies that there
would be more to come from the group. That may be, but it may also be that
after whatever the Board decides to do during its September retreat, this group
will become moot.





 





I therefore suggest we do not be any more specific in the
ToR than saying "deliver a report".





 





Stéphane





 





Le 24 août 2010 à 00:31, Liz Gasster a écrit :













All,





 





Attached
please find a clean copy of the draft charter Terms of Reference for your
review and input.  By the end of today’s call, participants had reviewed
all of the in-line edits previously suggested, resulting in this clean draft.
The drafting team did not complete review of more general comments made
previously, so these continue to be appended following the appendices. 
This content will be deleted before the Charter is finalized.  For those
of you who still have your comments appended to this draft, please let me know
if you think your previous comments have been resolved with these edits.





 





Please
review this draft and offer any further revisions you think should be
made.  The group will meet again next Monday 30 August at the same
time.   





 





Thanks,
Liz



<Rec6 TOR updated as of 23 Aug 2300 UTC.doc>