ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-mapo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-mapo] Revised draft Charter Terms of Reference for your review

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Revised draft Charter Terms of Reference for your review
  • From: Bertrand de La Chapelle <bdelachapelle@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:39:12 +0200

Not really. the deadline of September 13 seemed very unrealistic; but I'm
encouraged by the discussion yesterday.

OK for me to say just "a report". We'll see if we need more, as Stéphane
suggests.


B.

2010/8/24 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

>  Does anyone object to this change?
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Jon Nevett
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 24, 2010 7:09 AM
> *To:* Stéphane Van Gelder
> *Cc:* soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: [soac-mapo] Revised draft Charter Terms of Reference for
> your review
>
>
>
> I support Stephane's suggestion.  Thanks.  Jon
>
>
>
> On Aug 24, 2010, at 7:00 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
>
>
>
>  Thanks Liz,
>
>
>
> I would like to suggest the word "preliminary" be stricken from the very
> last sentence of this document (shown in red below):
>
>
>
> "The Rec6 CWG should deliver a preliminary report with comments from the
> GNSO, ALAC, and GAC not later than 13 September 2010 to meet the 11-day
> advance publication that the Board requests for its retreat on new gTLDs."
>
>
>
> While I understand from Frank's comments sent to the list yesterday that
> replacing it with the word "final" would be worrisome for the GAC, I do
> think the group's focus should be on meeting the deadline de-facto imposed
> on it by the Board retreat.
>
>
>
> Leaving "preliminary" in there implies that there would be more to come
> from the group. That may be, but it may also be that after whatever the
> Board decides to do during its September retreat, this group will become
> moot.
>
>
>
> I therefore suggest we do not be any more specific in the ToR than saying
> "deliver a report".
>
>
>
> Stéphane
>
>
>
> Le 24 août 2010 à 00:31, Liz Gasster a écrit :
>
>
>
>   All,
>
>
>
> Attached please find a clean copy of the draft charter Terms of Reference
> for your review and input.  By the end of today’s call, participants had
> reviewed all of the in-line edits previously suggested, resulting in this
> clean draft. The drafting team did not complete review of more general
> comments made previously, so these continue to be appended following the
> appendices.  This content will be deleted before the Charter is finalized.
> For those of you who still have your comments appended to this draft, please
> let me know if you think your previous comments have been resolved with
> these edits.
>
>
>
> Please review this draft and offer any further revisions you think should
> be made.  The group will meet again next Monday 30 August at the same time.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks, Liz
>
> <Rec6 TOR updated as of 23 Aug 2300 UTC.doc>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
____________________
Bertrand de La Chapelle
Délégué Spécial pour la Société de l'Information / Special Envoy for the
Information Society
Ministère des Affaires Etrangères et Européennes/ French Ministry of Foreign
and European Affairs
Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32

"Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint
Exupéry
("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy