<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Financial instrument
- To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Financial instrument
- From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 17:14:24 -0400
Avri,
What non-qualified applicants do is out of scope.
Can you explain this:
"A shared risk group that only has needy applicants in it, is less
likely to have the ability to cover the risk, than one that has
various kinds of applicant."
Please use words I can understand, like the staff skills necessary to
create the contractually obligated reports during periods of
continuity operations, and the associated cost, and the operational
staff and facilities necessary to operate during periods of continuity
operations, and the associated cost.
Barring force majeure or economic contraction on a scale sufficient to
affect two or more qualified operations simultaneously, for any group
of N risk pooling applicants, as subsequent cooperating operators, the
transition into (and possibly out of) continuity operations is
mutually independent.
Please explain why N qualified applicants forming a shared risk group
are "more likely to have the ability to cover the risk" if one
non-qualified applicant joins the shared risk group?
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|