ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Financial instrument

  • To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Financial instrument
  • From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 17:14:24 -0400


Avri,

What non-qualified applicants do is out of scope.

Can you explain this:

"A shared risk group that only has needy applicants in it, is less likely to have the ability to cover the risk, than one that has various kinds of applicant."

Please use words I can understand, like the staff skills necessary to create the contractually obligated reports during periods of continuity operations, and the associated cost, and the operational staff and facilities necessary to operate during periods of continuity operations, and the associated cost.

Barring force majeure or economic contraction on a scale sufficient to affect two or more qualified operations simultaneously, for any group of N risk pooling applicants, as subsequent cooperating operators, the transition into (and possibly out of) continuity operations is mutually independent.

Please explain why N qualified applicants forming a shared risk group are "more likely to have the ability to cover the risk" if one non-qualified applicant joins the shared risk group?

Eric



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy