Return to newtlds Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	fnord
Date/Time:	Wed, June 21, 2000 at 2:24 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Score:	5
Subject:	and...
Message:
The .com version of your third name claims to be trademarked, which helps to prove mine. Just opening new domains isn't the solution to scarcity (real or perceived), its a recipe for increased disputes and cybersquatting and existing TLD domain name holders mirroring themselves into new domains, whether they want to or not. But if they are going to go with any open domains, I think .web should get first crack at it, assuming they meet other necessary criteria (and assuming those are reasonable).       d_d@email.com - email without ICANN in Subject: line is blocked

Message Thread:

• ioDesign — iplawyer, June 19 @ 7:09 PM (2/18)
• go for it. — fnord, June 20 @ 4:41 AM (2/12)
• .net and .org taken — iplawyer, June 21 @ 12:05 AM (1/8)
• and... — fnord, June 21 @ 2:24 AM (2/7)
• Trademarking a Domain Name — iplayer, June 22 @ 12:07 AM (0/0)
• Law of Cyber Squatting — iplawyer, June 21 @ 11:55 PM (1/5)
• caselaw — fnord, June 22 @ 2:13 PM (2/4)
• Dot REG - you know it makes sense - common sense — Garry Anderson, June 23 @ 10:08 AM (0/0)
• .Com not a Bar to .Web — iplawyer, June 23 @ 12:08 AM (2/2)
• Common sense must prevail — Garry Anderson, June 23 @ 10:27 AM (0/0)
• hyperlinks — fnord, June 23 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)
• Tell me. . . — WorldThoughts, June 20 @ 9:38 AM (1/2)
• P.S. — WorldThoughts, June 20 @ 9:46 AM (1/1)
• .om — fnord, June 20 @ 5:55 PM (0/0)
• SUE — Lab, June 19 @ 8:55 PM (1/4)
• Lab, pal. . . — 410, June 19 @ 9:09 PM (1/3)
• Dear 410 — Lab, June 19 @ 9:29 PM (1/2)
• Man! — 410, June 19 @ 9:36 PM (1/1)
• :-) — Lab, June 19 @ 9:39 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy