Alexander,
I would very much like to get your comments
on the introduction of:1) .reg for registered trademarkholders
2) for the introduction
of .rcom, .rnet and .rorg for trademarkholders
3) for the parallel introduction
of .web (open) and .rweb (restricted) and the use of this system for all new gtlds.
4.
for the introduction of 42 new gtlds, which correspond to the main titles of the
42 trademark classes. This means that you get 42 open gtlds and 42 restricted ones
("r"...)
5. For adding the country code after the domain name in case someone holds
a trademark in this class, but just in 1 country.
Result: e.g.: www.intellinet.reg/us
or www.intellinet.reg/ch or www.intellinet.pro (provider) or www.intellinet.pro/ch,
and so on.
(The holder of www.intellinet.reg or .pro would be forced by law to
allow the other company the use of www.intellinet.reg/ch or .pro/us, etc. against
a fee of 35$ per year)
Result: Every trademarkholder could get a decent name by
that and the rest of the internet stays liberal, because, if he is quick, he can
use www.intellinet.com or .web, .us, .ch, ... , but if he isn't he stll gets a fair
name in the trademarked area.
Any comments on this?
Regards,
Friedrich