Return to newtlds Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	duffyking
Date/Time:	Sun, July 9, 2000 at 11:34 AM GMT
Browser:	Netscape Communicator V4.72 using Windows 98
Score:	5
Subject:	Reverse Hijacking should be looked at first
Message:
I agree.  My case is a clear case of reverse hijacking.  When the Complainant saw that I was accusing them of hijacking then they just went crazy and started being slanderous.  And this was a lawyer!.  I still do not understand what WIPO are doing.  Common sense is not prevailing.  It is the companies which huge legal departments who try and break the smaller companies.              Jan Duffy-King Principal eurotrash.com

Message Thread:

• Current TLD Dispute procedure must be sorted out first — duffyking, July 8 @ 9:28 PM (6/18)
• Agreed — friedrich, July 9 @ 11:57 AM (1/1)
• Again, Thanks — duffyking, July 9 @ 12:08 AM (0/0)
• To protect your domain name — Garry Anderson, July 9 @ 10:46 AM (2/7)
• Bad Idea — layman, July 9 @ 12:40 AM (2/5)
• Who is afraid of .reg? — friedrich, July 9 @ 2:20 PM (1/3)
• As I said — layman, July 9 @ 5:30 PM (2/2)
• dot REG is a certificate of authentication — Garry Anderson, July 10 @ 9:47 AM (0/0)
• Thanks for your (wrong) advices. — friedrich, July 9 @ 10:45 PM (0/0)
• You misunderstand - like most TM companies — Garry Anderson, July 9 @ 1:56 PM (0/0)
• Thanks but this won't work internationally — duffyking, July 9 @ 11:48 AM (0/0)
• I agree BUT — Merlin, July 9 @ 6:49 AM (1/1)
• If rules were laid down first this would work — duffyking, July 9 @ 11:54 AM (0/0)
• A GOOD PROPOSAL — Sotiris, July 9 @ 5:42 AM (1/1)
• ICANN set the rules so they should be involved — duffyking, July 9 @ 11:40 AM (0/0)
• Hear, hear! — Venster, July 8 @ 10:41 PM (1/1)
• Reverse Hijacking should be looked at first — duffyking, July 9 @ 11:34 AM (0/0)
• AGREED! — AboutMoney, July 8 @ 9:37 PM (1/1)
• Thanks — duffyking, July 8 @ 10:02 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy