ICANN set the rules so they should be involved

Return to newtlds Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: duffyking

Date/Time: Sun, July 9, 2000 at 11:40 AM GMT

Browser: Netscape Communicator V4.72 using Windows 98

Score: 5

Subject: ICANN set the rules so they should be involved

Message:

ICANN have set the rules and they now seem to be washing their hands like Pontius Pilate. This should not be the case.

Jan Duffy-King
Principal
eurotrash.com

Message Thread:

Current TLD Dispute procedure must be sorted out first — duffyking, July 8 @ 9:28 PM (6/18)

Agreed — friedrich, July 9 @ 11:57 AM (1/1)

Again, Thanks — duffyking, July 9 @ 12:08 AM (0/0)

To protect your domain name — Garry Anderson, July 9 @ 10:46 AM (2/7)

Bad Idea — layman, July 9 @ 12:40 AM (2/5)

Who is afraid of .reg? — friedrich, July 9 @ 2:20 PM (1/3)

As I said — layman, July 9 @ 5:30 PM (2/2)

dot REG is a certificate of authentication — Garry Anderson, July 10 @ 9:47 AM (0/0)
Thanks for your (wrong) advices. — friedrich, July 9 @ 10:45 PM (0/0)

You misunderstand - like most TM companies — Garry Anderson, July 9 @ 1:56 PM (0/0)

Thanks but this won't work internationally — duffyking, July 9 @ 11:48 AM (0/0)

I agree BUT — Merlin, July 9 @ 6:49 AM (1/1)

If rules were laid down first this would work — duffyking, July 9 @ 11:54 AM (0/0)

A GOOD PROPOSAL — Sotiris, July 9 @ 5:42 AM (1/1)

ICANN set the rules so they should be involved — duffyking, July 9 @ 11:40 AM (0/0)

Hear, hear! — Venster, July 8 @ 10:41 PM (1/1)

Reverse Hijacking should be looked at first — duffyking, July 9 @ 11:34 AM (0/0)

AGREED! — AboutMoney, July 8 @ 9:37 PM (1/1)

Thanks — duffyking, July 8 @ 10:02 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy